×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

A SOCIO-PEDAGOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND JUVENILE DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR

By
Jakub Hasić ,
Jakub Hasić
Contact Jakub Hasić

Uprava policije Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova Zeničko-dobojskog kantona,

Izet Pehlić ,
Izet Pehlić

Islamski pedagoški fakultet u Zenici,

Suad Orlić
Suad Orlić

Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Zeničko-dobojskog kantona,

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish the relationship between social support and juvenile delinquent behavior after the juvenile delinquents’ assessment of the quality of social support. The research was carried out employing a method of theoretical analysis and a descriptive-analytical survey method. A Social Support Scale (Abbey, Abramis and Caplan, 1985) and a Youth Self-Reported Delinquency and Risk Behaviors Questionnaire (Ručević, Ajduković and Šincek, 2009) were used as the research instruments. The research sample consisted of 205 juveniles from Zenica-Doboj Canton who had at least once committed a felony or misdemeanor. The research results suggested that juvenile delinquents receiving a higher level of social support are statistically significantly less likely to exhibit all forms of delinquent behaviors: misdemeanor and less serious forms of delinquency, undesirable normative behaviors, risky sexual behaviors, the use or abuse of psychoactive substances, violent behavior within close relationships, theft, burglary, robbery, suicidal and self-aggressive behaviors. It was concluded that strengthening the quality of social support contributes to the prevention of juvenile delinquent behavior.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.