×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Značenjske intencije apsolutnog objekta u kur'anskom tekstu

By
Midhat Jugo
Midhat Jugo

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica

Abstract

This paper deals with semantic intentions of the absolute object in the Qur’anic text. The aim is to establish frequent morphosyntactic patterns by which the absolute object is realized in the Qur'anic text, and then to offer a linguistic description of the role the absolute object plays in shaping the semantic dimension of the Qur'anic text, and based on selected linguistic expressions to establish individual semantic intentions of the absolute object in the Qur'an. In this paper we used an analytical-descriptive method, which was realized by applying a linguistic-stylistic analysis based on classical Arabic grammatical analysis of marking frequent linguistic patterns of the absolute object, and an analysis procedure based on the theory of naẓm, which was established by 'Abdulqāhir al-Ğurğānī, and which deals with the role of linguistic units in a statement. The research results show that each individual form of the absolute object has a targeted role in the Qur'anic text that can be discerned on a structural and semantic level. In addition to the intensity, description of the quality and number of acts, the absolute object realizes numerous semantic intentions, among which are: the confirmation of a real event realization, introduction of optimism, description of the quality of the realization of the act of reciting and delivering the Qur'an, glorification, display of the God's omnipotence and the beauty of His creation, admonishment and fear-mongering, threat, reprimand, plea, etc. As a frequent element of the Qur'anic discourse, the absolute object is an important argumentative marker significantly affecting the realization of the overall semantic intentions and the understanding of the Qur'anic text.

References

1.
Al-Sāmirā’ī. Ma‘ānī al-naḥw. al-Qāhira: Šarika al-‘ātik.
2.
Ivić M. Pravci u lingvistici.
3.
Jugo M, Hajrić A. Stylistic potential of the absolute object in the text of the Qur’an. Zbornik radova 18. 2021;(19):411–30.
4.
Karić E. Kur’an s prijevodom na bosanski jezik.
5.
Omar AM. Ilm al-dilāla.
6.
Muftić T. Gramatika arapskog jezika.
7.
Naḥla M. Dirāsāt qur’āniyya fī ğuz’ ‘amma.
8.
Al-kashf wa-l-bayān ʿan asrār al-adyān fī Kitāb al-insān al-kāmil wa-kāmil al-insān. Christian-Muslim Relations 1500 - 1900.
9.
Adi DR. RU’YATULLAH PERSPEKTIF MU’TAZILAH DAN  AHL AL-SUNNAH WA AL-JAM Ā’AH(Studi Komparatif Tafsīr al-Kasshāf Karya al-Zamakhshary dan Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb Karya al-Rāzī). Studia Quranika. 3(2).
10.
Ṣafwaṭ al-tafāsīr.
11.
Ibn Ğinnī O.
12.
Al-hiğāğ fī al-Qur’an min hilāl ’ahamm hasā’isih al-’uslūbiyya.
13.
Sībāwayh AQ.
14.
Serl D. Govorni činovi: ogled iz filozofije jezika.
15.
Softić M. Kompendij arapske sintakse Ibrahima Opijača Mostarca.
16.
Šarīf M. al-Tarkīb al-naḥwī wa šawāhiduh al-qur’āniyya.
17.
Al-Ṭabarī MĞ. Ğāmi‘ al-bayān fī t’awīl al-Qur’an.
18.
Uḍayma M. A.
19.
Romani FR, Di Vincenzo E. Muḥammad Bayram’s Risāla fī dār al-ḥarb wa-suknāhā. <i>Dār al-islām / dār al-ḥarb</i> 2017. p. 393–414.
20.
Ramadlan M ‘Athif A, Masngut M. Al-Mushkilāt fī al-Tamyīz bayna al-Tarkīb al-Iḍāfī wa-al-Tarkīb al-Naʿtī fī al-Qirā’ah li-Ṭalabat al-Jāmiʿah. Alsina : Journal of Arabic Studies. 4(1):1–22.
21.
Min balāġa al-Qur’ān.
22.
Permata BA. Ilm al-Lughah fi al-Turats al-Arabiy wa ’Inda al-Gharb: Muqanah Tathowwuratihi wa Maudhuatihi ’Inda al-Arab wa al-Gharb. Asalibuna. 3(02):75–86.
23.
Živković P. Freelancer: “The spirit of the globally desirable stateless citizen”: Mirjana Radović Marković, Dejan Radulović, Borislav Đukanović: Working from Home - Economic, Legal and Socio-Psychological Aspects of Working from Home, Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića, Sremski Karlovci - Novi Sad, 2021. Socioloski pregled. 2022;56(2):724–33.
24.
Dizdar E. Stilski potencijal atributa u arapskom jeziku.
25.
Al-Ġalāyīnī M. Ğāmi‘ al-durūs al-‘arabiyya.
26.
Apellániz F. An Unknown Minority between the dār al-ḥarb and the dār al-islām. <i>Dār al-islām / dār al-ḥarb</i> 2017. p. 159–81.
27.
Dalā’il al-’i‘ğāz.
28.
M.A.K. H, Hasan R. Cohesion in English.
29.
Mubarok A. MUSHKILAH AL-AḤĀDĪTH AL-DAKHĪLAH FĪ TAFSĪR AL-QUR’ĀN AL-῾AẒĪM. AL ITQAN: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an. 7(2):283–302.
30.
31.
Ḥassān T. Hawāṭir min ta’ammul luġa al-Qur’an al-Karim.
32.
Ḥassān T. al-Luġa al-‘arabiyya m‘anāha wa mabnāhā.
33.
Mufid A. AL-KASHF ‘AN AL-ḤAQĀIQ AL-‘ILMIYYAH FĪ AL-QUR’ĀN AL-KARĪM. QOF. 4(1):19–44.
34.
Šarḥ Ibn ‘Aqīl.
35.
al-Taḥrīr wa al- tanwīr. In: Bayrūt: Mu’assasa al-tārīh al -‘arabī.
36.
Nursomad N. Al-Ittijah al-Ṣūfī wa al-Adab al-Sāmī fī al-Adab al-Indūnīsī al-Mu’āṣir. Studia Islamika. 6(3).
37.
Ibn Hišām GA. Awḍaḥ al-masālik’ ’ilā ’alfiyya Ibn Mālik.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.