The aim of this paper was to find out whether teachers' attitudes about learning and teaching will be reflected in the attitudes about education for ecologically sustainable development.
In terms of research methods, a method of theoretical analysis and a descriptive-analytical survey method were used, while survey was used as a research technique. The following research instruments were used: The Questionnaire on Teachers’ Attitudes about Learning and Teaching (Suzić, 2005: 928–929) and the Questionnaire on Teachers’ Attitudes about Education for Sustainable Development, created for the purposes of this research. The research sample consisted of 120 elementary school teachers and 120 high school teachers.
The results of the research on attitudes about learning and teaching showed that elementary school teachers achieve a statistically significantly higher average score than high school teachers on the subscales of Motivation, Attitudes about the Current State and Involvement in Changes, while there were no statistically significant differences in Attitudes about Commitment to Changes. Furthermore, the results indicated that acting in accordance with education for sustainable development is not statistically significantly related to attitudes about learning and teaching, but that positive attitudes about learning and teaching reflect positively in the nature, contents and skills of education for ecologically sustainable development.
References
1.
Previšić V. Globalne dimenzije održiva razvoja u nacionalnom školstvu.
2.
Forum WE. The Dakar Framework for Action, Paris: Office of the Assistant Director.
3.
Hercegovine V. Strateški pravci razvoja obrazovanja u u Bosni i Hercegovini sa planom implementiranja.
4.
Kalem i Centar za napredne studije.
5.
Vejo E. Tradicijske odgojne vrijednosti u bošnjačkoj porodici.
6.
Vejo E. Priroda porodičnog odgojnog uzora kod Bošnjaka.
7.
Tufekčić N. Ekološka pedagogija – Osnovi nauke o odgoju za okolinu i održivi razvoj.
8.
Suzić N. PROCRUSTES MODEL OF DEMOCRACY IN BIH. Defendologija. 16(33):9–16.
9.
Suzić N. Pedagogija za XXI vijek.
10.
Stoll L i F, D. Mijenjajmo naše škole – Kako unaprijediti djelotvornost i kvalitetu škola.
11.
učenja.
12.
Slunjski E. Dječji vrtić zajednica koja uči – mjesto, dijaloga, suradnje i zajedničkog.
13.
Slatina M. Od individue do ličnosti: uvođenje u teoriju konfluentnog obrazovanja.
14.
Razum R. Odgojno djelovanje suvremene škole: izazovi i mogućnosti za religiozni odgoj. Bogoslovska smotra. 77, br. 4:857–80.
15.
Kardum I, Hudek-Knežević J, Krapić N. Lokus kontrole i tjelesno zdravlje. Klinička psihologija. 2016;9(2):271–92.
16.
Centar za politike i upravljanje.
17.
Pastuović N. Edukologija: integrativna znanost o sustavu cjeloživotnog obrazovanja i odgoja.
18.
Kovačević G, Korajlić N. Preduvjeti za reformu Izbornog zakonodavstva u Bosni i Hercegovini. Reforma izbornog zakonodavstva Bosne i Hercegovine. 2021.
19.
year. 8, Vol.. 1:1–17.
20.
Niemi H. Why from Teaching to Learning? European Educational Research Journal. 2009;8(1):1–17.
21.
Mužić V. Uvod u metodologiju istraživanja odgoja i obrazovanja.
22.
Mrnjaus K. Pedagoška promišljanja o vrijednostima.
23.
McKeown R. Environment Society Economy Education for Sustainable Development. Toolkit Version. 2.
24.
Kyriacou C. Temeljna nastavna umijeća: metodički priručnik za uspješno poučavanje i učenje.
25.
gedankliche Einführung.
26.
Grießhammer S. Zugänge zum Lernbegriff in der Erwachsenenbildung – eine kleine.
27.
Minić J. Momirović Konstantin, Kostić Petar, Hošek Ankica: Tanatos - nagon smrti, Centar za primenjenu psihologiju, Beograd, 2007. Зборник радова Филозофског факултета у Приштини. 2020;50(1):333–7.
28.
Kornhauser A, Manley M, Padrón Quero M, Savané MA, Singh K, Stavenhagen R, et al. Učenje: blago u nama. Izvješće UNESCO-u međunarodnog povjerenstva za razvoj obrazovanja za 21. stoljeće.
29.
Delors J, Al Mufti I, Amagi I, Carneiro R, Chung F, Geremek B, et al.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
