This paper examines Hanafī legal school theoretical interpretations of the logical and legal meaning of the legislative text (dalālatu-n-naṣṣ) and the consequences of such an interpretation on the legal norms that the Hanafis came to with their ijtihād. At the beginning, the question of possible textual indications (ed-delalāt) of legislative texts is considered, then the linguistic and terminological definition of the concept of dalālatu-n-naṣṣ in Hanafī school. Through the examples of dalālatu-n-naṣṣ, it was explained how the Hanafīs used dalālatu-n-naṣṣ in the argumentation of legal norms. Furthermore, the status of dalālatu-n-naṣṣ in the Hanafī legal school and the preference in the case of contradictions between išāratu-n-naṣṣ and dalālatu-n-naṣṣ have been clarified. At the end, the results that have been made through the paper research are listed.
References
1.
Rušd I. Bidājetu-l-mudžtehid, Dāru-l-marife.
2.
Kamali M. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, Islamic Texts Society.
3.
Qudāme I. El-Mugnī, Mektebetu-r-Riyāḍ el-ḥadīhe.
4.
Ibn Qudāme M. Revḍatun-nāḍir ve džinnetu-l-menāẓir, Džāmiʻatu-l-imām Muḥammed ibn Saʻūd.
5.
Ibn Mādždže M. Sunen ibn Mādždže.
6.
7.
Muslim Ḥ.K. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Dāru iḥjā’i-l-kutub el-ʻarebijje, Kairo.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
