×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

A SOCIO-PEDAGOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE QUALITY OF SOCIAL SUPPORT AND JUVENILE DELINQUENT BEHAVIOR

By
Jakub Hasić ,
Jakub Hasić

Uprava policije Ministarstva unutrašnjih poslova Zeničko-dobojskog kantona

Izet Pehlić ,
Izet Pehlić

Islamski pedagoški fakultet u Zenici

Suad Orlić
Suad Orlić

Ministarstvo unutrašnjih poslova Zeničko-dobojskog kantona

Abstract

The aim of this research was to establish the relationship between social support and juvenile delinquent behavior after the juvenile delinquents’ assessment of the quality of social support. The research was carried out employing a method of theoretical analysis and a descriptive-analytical survey method. A Social Support Scale (Abbey, Abramis and Caplan, 1985) and a Youth Self-Reported Delinquency and Risk Behaviors Questionnaire (Ručević, Ajduković and Šincek, 2009) were used as the research instruments. The research sample consisted of 205 juveniles from Zenica-Doboj Canton who had at least once committed a felony or misdemeanor. The research results suggested that juvenile delinquents receiving a higher level of social support are statistically significantly less likely to exhibit all forms of delinquent behaviors: misdemeanor and less serious forms of delinquency, undesirable normative behaviors, risky sexual behaviors, the use or abuse of psychoactive substances, violent behavior within close relationships, theft, burglary, robbery, suicidal and self-aggressive behaviors. It was concluded that strengthening the quality of social support contributes to the prevention of juvenile delinquent behavior.

References

1.
Miković M. Maloljetnička delinkvencija i socijalni rad, Magistrat.
2.
Wolff JM, Crockett LJ. The Role of Deliberative Decision Making, Parenting, and Friends in Adolescent Risk Behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2011;40(12):1607–22.
3.
Wilson JQ, Herrnstein RJ. Crime as a choice. In: Readings in Contemporary Criminological Theory.
4.
Shaffer D. Psychiatric Diagnosis in Child and Adolescent Suicide. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1996;53(4):339.
5.
Ručević S, Ajduković M i Š, D. Razvoj Upitnika samoiskaza rizičnog i delikventnog ponašanja mladih, Kriminologija i socijalna integracija. 17, 1:1–96.
6.
Ricijaš N, Krajcer K, Bouillet D. Rizična ponašanja zagrebačkih srednjoškolaca– razlike s obzirom na spol. Odgojne znanosti. 12(1):45–63.
7.
Petrović B i M, G. Kriminologija.
8.
Patterson GR, Stouthamer-Loeber M. The Correlation of Family Management Practices and Delinquency. Child Development. 1984;55(4):1299.
9.
Patterson GR, Reid JB, Dishion TJ. Antisocial boys.
10.
Nikolić Z i J, I. Maloljetnička delinkvencija, Beograd: Institut za kriminološka i sociološka istraživanja.
11.
Abbey A, Abramis DJ, Caplan RD. Effects of Different Sources of Social support and Social Conflict on Emotional Well-Being. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 1985;6(2):111–29.
12.
Lyons-Ruth K, Connell DB, Zoll D, Stahl J. Infants at social risk: Relations among infant maltreatment, maternal behavior, and infant attachment behavior. Developmental Psychology. 23(2):223–32.
13.
JESSOR R. Risk behavior in adolescence: A psychosocial framework for understanding and action. Journal of Adolescent Health. 1991;12(8):597–605.
14.
Jašović Ž. Kriminologija maloljetničke delinkvencije.
15.
Hrnčić J. Prestupništvo mladih rizici, tokovi i ishodi.
16.
Hrnčić J. Pregled faktora rizika antisocijalnog ponašanja mladih (uticaji u okviru porodice. Revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo. 3:43–72.
17.
Grujić Z. Prevencija maloljetničke delinkvencije, Beograd: Revija za krivično pravo i kriminologiju.
18.
Cerić I, Oruč L, Salihović H i M, B. Zloupotreba psihoaktivnih supstanci i lijekova.
19.
Buljubašić S. Maloljetnička delinkvencija.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.