×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

THE MAZDAIST ROOTS OF HERACLITUS’S PHILOSOPHY

By
Sedad Dizdarević ,
Sedad Dizdarević

Islamski pedagoški fakultet u Zenici

Mensur Valjevac
Mensur Valjevac

Islamski pedagoški fakultet u Zenici

Abstract

Heraclitus is one of the most influential and most controversial thinkers in the human history. His ideas had an impact on the formation and further development of some of the most important and most specific concepts in philosophy, such as idea, dialectics, logos, eternal return, etc. He exerted a significant influence over all great philosophers such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Hegel, Nietzsche, etc. Heraclitus's ideas were exceptionally strange and unusual for his time, so many, very early, started suspecting they were of Greek origin. In this article, we analyze the theories about the Persian origin of the key Heraclitus’s ideas. We point to the most important research in that field, name some of the advantages and disadvantages of certain claims and make our own that is, to some extent, different from the previous ones. We show that Heraclitus was, to a large extent, under the influence of Persian Mazdaist teachings of his time, and that this impact was essential for the conceptualization of his most important concepts, such as teachings about logos, dialectical monism, Unus Mundus, Coincidentia Oppositorium, eternal movement, etc. Furthermore, Heraclitus was the first Greek thinker who mentioned the Zoroastrian magi in his work, criticized the practice of worshiping the idols, depicting the figures of deities, and religious exclusivism following the practice developed in the Achaemenid Empire.

References

1.
Durant W. The Story of Philosophy: the Lives and Opinions of the Greater Philosophers.
2.
3.
4.
SuhrawardiSY. Majmu’a-yi musannafati-i Shaykh Ishraq II.
5.
Suhrawardi SY.
6.
Sachs J. Aristotle: Motion and its Place in Nature, Internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
7.
Mevlana Rumi J. In: Masnawi Ma’navi.
8.
Nusservanji M, Dhalla. History of zoroastrianism.
9.
Koplston F. Istorija filozofije I-Grčka i Rim, prev.
10.
Heraklit. Tako kazuje Heraklit, Efežanin, prev.
11.
Heraklit. Heraklit Fragmenti, prev.
12.
Fraser JT, Haber FC, MullerGH. The Study of Time.
13.
Filipović V. Filozofijski rječnik.
14.
Farshad M. Andisheye qantumi Molana, peyvande elm o erfan.
15.
Aćimović M. Ontološke kategorije Aristotelove filozofije prirode. Arhe br. 2.
16.
Duchesne-Guillemin J. Heraclitus and Iran. History of Religions. 1963;3(1):34–49.
17.
Darvishi D. Filsuf-e tarik: Negahi be negashteha va engashtehaye Heraklitus.
18.
Corbin. Cyclical Time & Ismaili Gnosis.
19.
Corbin H. Spiritual Body and Celetian Earth from Mazdean Iran to Shi’ite Iran, prev.
20.
Cleve FM. The Giants of Pre-Sophistic Greek Philosophy. 1965.
21.
K CH. The art and thought of Heraclitus.
22.
Campbell J. Man and Time Paper from the Eranos Yearbooks III.
23.
Burkert W.
24.
Boyce M. Ardwashišt". Encyclopedia Iranica. 2.
25.
Boyce M. Zoroaster the priest. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. 1970;33(1):22–38.
26.
Bošnjak B. Grčka filoofija.
27.
Ashwin-Siejkowski P. Clement of Alexandria on Trial. 2010.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.