×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

RAZLIKE U INTENZITETU STRESA I STRATEGIJAMA SUOČAVANJA SA STRESOM KOD DEMINERA S OBZIROM NA RADNO MJESTO I DUŽINU RADNOG STAŽA

By
Aldin Goletić
Aldin Goletić

Kantonalni zavod za medicinu rada i sportsku medicinu Zenica

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine the difference in the intensity of stress and coping strategies of deminers with regard to the position and length of service. The study included 216 participants, or deminers of Armed Forces in BiH of varying lengths of service, which include deminers of various demining teams of BiH Armed Forces, who work on different or specific jobs and of working conditions depending on the type of work activity. The following measuring instruments were used for the research: Demographic Information Questionnaire, the Job Stress Inventory (JSI) and Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, by Endler and Parker (CISS). The results showed that, as a whole, there were no significant differences in the intensity of stress and coping strategies with regard to the position and length of service. Differences were found in the intensity of stress in relation to the position and length of service, and in coping focused on emotions and coping focused on the problem in relation to the workplace.

References

1.
Božičević V, Brlas S, Gulin M. Psihologija u zaštiti mentalnog zdravlja.
2.
Endler NS, Parker JD. Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 58(5):844–54.
3.
Havelka M. Zdravstvena psihologija.
4.
Hudek-Knežević J, Kardum I. Stres i tjelesno zdravlje.
5.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stres, procjena i suočavanje.
6.
Leiter MP, Maslach C. Spriječite sagorijevanje na poslu.
7.
Vizek-Vidović V. Stres u radu. Zagreb: Radna zajednica republičke konferencije Saveza socijalističke omladine Hrvatske.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.