Since Ilhamija is one of the most influential personalities of Bosnian culture at the end of Otoman period learning his intelectual and spiritual exertion becomes necessary in order to better undertand his importance for total social and cultural flow in Bosnia and Herzegovina at that time. Applying the deconstructional method of text analysis, Ilhamija's most important works were analyzed. Through this analysis the author tried to distinguish the most characteristic lines of force of his intelectual and spiritual background. As a rezult of this analysis comes a conclusion that Ilhamija was mostla a mystic, imbued by religious and gnostic zeal, who recognized his mission in raising his compatriots' consciousness and enlightening them.
His intelectual background is strongly marked by mystic spirituality where transcedental love and yearning for closness to God prevails. Moral, asceticism and prayer are the substance material of his inner spiritual being, and enligtenment zeal, rebelliousness and social activity are the basic thread of his outter being.
Key words: Abdulvehhab Ilhamija, History, Literature, Tesavvuf, Enlightenment
References
1.
Abdurahman N. Hrestomatija bosanske alhamijado književnosti.
2.
Dželaluddin M. Mesnevija (tom II), prema Nikolsonovom kritičkom izdanju priredio Mehdi Azarjazdi Horamšahi.
3.
Lamija H i E. Poezija Bošnjaka na orijentalnim jezicima.
4.
Mehmed H. Književni rad bosansko-hercegovačkih muslimana.
5.
Muhammed H. Alhamijado književnost i njeni stvaraoci.
6.
Muhammed H. Ilhamija, život i djelo.
7.
Muhammed H. Nekoliko pjesama iz Ilhamijina divana, u: Anali Gazihusrev-begove biblioteke, knjiga XIII-XIV, str, 85-92.
8.
Muslihuddin S. Komplet Sadijevih djela, priredio Muhammed Ali Forugi.
9.
Safvet-beg B. , Bošnjaci i Hercegovci u islamskoj književnosti.
10.
Safvet-beg B. Znameniti Hrvati, Bošnjaci i Hercegovci u turskoj carevini.
11.
Smail B. Kultura Bošnjaka.
12.
Šabanović H. Književnost muslimana na orijentalnim jezicima.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
