×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

PRESENCE OF KIRA’AT IN HANDŽIĆ’S ANNOTATION OF THE QUR’AN

By
Halil Mehtić
Halil Mehtić
Contact Halil Mehtić

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica,

Abstract

Mehmed Handžić (1906-1944) is one of the most significant Bosnian alims (scholars). Even though he lived shortly, he is the most prolific Bosnian alim that left us imposing literary work from various studies. What makes him unique and original among the Bosnian ulama is the fact that he was the only one, in the modern history of the Bosniaks, who wrote a commentary of the Noble Qur’an in Arabic. He was especially interested in ayatul-ahkam, ayats with Shari’ah (legal) themes. The most significant annotations from this field are: surahs Al-Baqarah and An-Nisa’. By detailed analysis of the interpretations of these two surahs, it can be concluded that he relied greatly on tafsir works of eminent mufassirs such as: Tabary, Jassas, Ibn al-‘Arabi, Kurtuby, Alusy, Zamakhshary, Razy, Baydavy, Ibn Kathir, Jalalayn, Nasafy, etc. In addition to works of tafsir, he also used other sources such as hadith, fikh and linguistic works. When reading Handžić’s tafsir works, one can say with certainty that he used kira’ats for additional argumentation of his attitudes and as arguments for answers to some fiqh questions, in addition to other resources of his interpretation, thus following the practice of former proponents of traditional-rational method when interpreting the Qur’an. This paper also includes some quotes that illustrate how Handžić considered kira’at as being important in the interpretation of the Qur’an, as well as some concrete examples that show presence of kira’at in his interpretation of the Noble Qur’an. Keywords: Handžić /tafsir/ interpretation/ kira’ats/

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.