×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

POETRY IN HANDŽIĆ’S INTERPRETATION OF THE QUR’AN

By
Halil Mehtić
Halil Mehtić
Contact Halil Mehtić

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica,

Abstract

Mehmed ef. Handžić, (1906-1944) was a prominent Bosnian scholar with an imposing opus in different fields. The uniqueness of his works lies in the fact that he was the only one, in modern history of Bosnian Muslims, to interpret the Holy Qur’an in Arabic, and to treat the ayats with sharia background (ajatul-ahkam). His important interpretations are: the interpretation of the El-Bekare and En-Nisa' suras. Interpreting these suras he relied on some classic works of certain eminent mufessirs like: Taberij, Džessaa, Ibnul-'Areby, Kurtuby, Alusy, Zamahshery, Razy, Bejdavy, Ibn Kesir, Dželalejn, Nesefy, etc. among the mentioned mufessirs there are representatives of traditional, rational and linguistic method of interpreting the Qur’an and that shows that Handžić ingeniously managed to make a synthesis of the three Taffsir methods. He also often relied on other sources such as Hadith, Fikh, and some linguistic works. Analyzing Handžić’s interpretation of the Qur’an, it is obvious that he, like other representatives of traditionally-rational method of interpreting the Qur’an, also used poetry as additional arguments in finding a proper solution to some sharia-legal issues. He only twice names the two poets: El-E'aša and El-Kusejjir. Researching his use of poetry, we found out that he borrowed some stanzas from Ebu Temam bin Evs Et-Tai-y and Hassan bin Sabit. For some of the borrowed lines sources are unknown. This paper presents some of the examples that back up our statements. Key words: (Handžić, Taffsir, interpretation, poetry, poets, Qur’an, Hadith, El-Bekare, En-Nisa’)

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.