×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

SLIČNOSTI I RAZLIKE U KVALITETI PORODIČNIH ODNOSA S MAJKOM I OCEM U RAZVOJNOM PERIODU ADOLESCENCIJE

By
Tamara Efendić-Spahić
Tamara Efendić-Spahić
Contact Tamara Efendić-Spahić

The Faculty of Philosophy in Tuzla, University of Tuzla,

Abstract

The survey conducted on a sample of 91 subjects, students of various departments at Faculty of Philosophy in Tuzla, was aimed to identify how they estimated quality of the relationship with their parents. For this purpose questionnaires of past and present relationships with mother and father were applied, in which the quality of relationships between parents and adolescents through the dimensions of past relationships – the care, control and rejection, and present relationships – through the perception of support and negative relationships with parents was assessed. The results confirmed the hypothesis that adolescents assessed relationships with their parents as positive, regardless of the dimension of time. Also, the results showed that there was a high overlap between the adolescents’ assessments of relationships with parents in the past and the present, and that the mutual assessments of father and mother highly correlated, so we could discuss about coordination of parental child-rearing practices. Nevertheless, there were significant differences in the perception of positive and negative aspects of the relationship of mother and father. The study results pointed to the fact that on the positive dimensions adolescents assessed care, support and control of mother in higher values, while on the negative dimensions of parenting they valued more rejection and negative relationships with their father.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.