Numerous research studies have shown that teaching profession is one of those most susceptible to stress. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, there are also some additional aggravating circumstances which might be considered stress factors among teachers, primarily a low socio-economic status and forced adaptation to systematic school changes. Moreover, teachers are often victims of a social and moral crisis as well as of the changed roles in education.
This paper aims to provide an insight into the current state of teachers' mental health, the presence of stress and stress factors, and to investigate whether and to what extent personality traits and social and economic factors are significant predictors of teachers' perception of stress and their mental health.
The following instruments were used: BIG 5, Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) and Mental Health Inventory (MHI). The sample comprised 181 teachers working in state elementary and high schools in B&H. The results indicate that a moderate level of stress is present among teachers. The stress sources are mainly professional limitations (M=2,56), the issue of discipline and students' motivation (M=2,46), and stress factors related to profession (M=2,47) – large classes, too much paperwork, too little time and money for preparation. The most common manifestations of stress are cardiovascular disorders (M=2,02), fatigue (M=1,91) and emotional disorders (M=1,87).
Statistically significant correlations were found between personality traits of extroversion of comfort, conscientiousness, neuroticism and openness, ranging from 0,169 to 0,381. The strongest correlation existed between neuroticism and extroversion. Neuroticism was mainly found to correlate positively with the subscales of stress and stress manifestations, while extroversion was in a negative correlation with stress perception and manifestation. In terms of the correlation between personality traits and MHI subscales, the correlation was in the range between 0,218 and 0,590, with the subscale of neuroticism showing moderately high correlation with anxiety, depression, behavior and emotional control, psychological instability, but also demonstrating negative correlation with psychological well-being, general positive affect and general mental health index.
The regression analysis showed that the personality traits of neuroticism and extroversion, but also of conscientiousness, i.e., comfort, were significant predictors of teachers’ mental health and their stress perception. Neuroticism was a significant predictor of time management, professional limitations, discipline and motivation, but also of emotional manifestations of fatigue, cardiovascular disorders, and the total score on the scale of stress, anxiety, depression, the loss of emotional and behavior control, psychological instability, psychological well-being and mental health in general. Extroversion was a significant predictor of professional limitations, discipline and motivation, emotional manifestations, while consciousness significantly predicted gastrointestinal disorders, and comfort predicted depression, psychological instability and the index of mental health. Among social and economic factors, age was a significant predictor of emotional manifestation of stress, while working experience and level of education were significant predictors of gastrointestinal disorders.
Keywords: personality traits, stress among teachers, teachers’ mental health.
References
1.
Padejski N. Uticaj dimenzija ličnosti i stilova prevladavanja stresa na psihološko blagostanje. Primenjena psihologija. 3(3):269–82.
2.
Kokkinos CM. Job stressors, personality and burnout in primary school teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2007;77(1):229–43.
3.
Krapić N. Dimenzije ličnosti petofaktorskog modela i radno ponašanje. Psihologijske teme. 14, br. 1:39–55.
4.
Kyriacou C. Teacher stress and burnout: an international review. Educational Research. 1987;29(2):146–52.
5.
R.J. L, D.M B. Psihologija ličnosti.
6.
Lewis R. Social Psychology of Education. 1999;3(3):155–71.
7.
Smethem L, Adey K. Some effects of statutory induction on the professional development of newly qualified teachers: a comparative study of pre‐ and post‐induction experiences. Journal of Education for Teaching. 2005;31(3):187–200.
8.
Mojsa-Kaja J, Golonka K, Marek T. Job burnout and engagement among teachers – Worklife areas and personality traits as predictors of relationships with work. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. :102–19.
9.
Mrozek K. Teacher Stress Presentation,dostupno u aprilu 2020.
10.
John OP, Srivastava S. The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In: Handbook of personaltiy> Theory and research (Vol2. p. 102-138 ,.
11.
Paleksić V, Ubović R, Popović M. Osobine ličnosti i sindrom sagorijevanja kod nastavnika osnovnih i srednjih škola. Scripta Medica. 46(2):118–24.
12.
Rajendran R RR. Percieved Sources of Stress among Teachers. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology. 33(1):133–6.
13.
Selye H. Geschichte und Grundzüge des Stresskonzepts.
14.
Shokrkon A, Nicoladis E. How personality traits of neuroticism and extroversion predict the effects of the COVID-19 on the mental health of Canadians. PLOS ONE. 16(5):e0251097.
15.
The Big Five Personality Test- dostupno na.
16.
Ziegler M, Danay E, Schölmerich F, Bühner M. Predicting academic success with the Big 5 rated from different points of view: Self‐rated, other rated and faked. European Journal of Personality. 2010;24(4):341–55.
17.
Zotović M, Petrović J. Prevladavanje stresa u adolescenciji: relacije sa karakteristikama ličnosti i mentalnim zdravljem. Primenjena psihologija. 4(3):245–61.
18.
Smojver-Ažić S ŽBI. Izvori stresa na poslu odgojitelja u dječijim vrtićima. Psihologijske teme. 14, br 2:3–13.
19.
Karlak M, Varga R, Ćosić I. Kompetencije za poučavanje djece rane i predškolske dobi engleskom kao stranom jeziku. Strani jezici. 2022;51(1):105–26.
20.
Anhorn R. The Profession That Eats Its Young. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. 74:15–26.
21.
Bartone PT, Eid J, Helge Johnsen B, Christian Laberg J, Snook SA. Big five personality factors, hardiness, and social judgment as predictors of leader performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 2009;30(6):498–521.
22.
R. B, A. K, R L. Stress at work, The Work Foundation.
23.
Uehara D.L BZA. Coping with Teacher Stress: A Research Synthesis for Pacific Educators.
24.
Cosgrove J. Breakdown – The facts about stres sin teaching.
25.
Cabarkapa M, Korica V, Rodjenkov S. Personal traits and a sense of job-related stress in a military aviation crew. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2011;68(2):143–9.
26.
A.R. D, C.D. S, Ware J.E PJR. Scoring manual: Adult health status and patient satisfaction measures used in RAND’s Health Insurance Experiment.
27.
Atanasoska T EF. Occupational Stress of Teachers: A Comparative Study Between Turkey and. Macedonia ,International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 1(7):59–65.
28.
Agai–Demjaha T, Karadzinska Bislimovska J, Mijakoski D. Level of Work Related Stress among Teachers in Elementary Schools. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 3(3):484–8.
29.
M.J F. Teacher Stress Inventory.
30.
Foro. Profesionalne kompetencije nastavnika u suočavanja sa stresnim situacijama u školi, doktorska disertacija, Filozofski fakultet.
31.
Gholamitooranposhti M. Teachers’ Mental Health. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;69:1295–301.
32.
Goddard R, O’Brien P, Goddard M. Work environment predictors of beginning teacher burnout. British Educational Research Journal. 2006;32(6):857–74.
33.
R.A GYR. Teachers Managing Stress and Preventing Burnout: The professional Health Solution.
34.
Hakanen JJ, Bakker AB, Schaufeli WB. Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology. 2006;43(6):495–513.
35.
Hurtz GM, Donovan JJ. Personality and job performance: The Big Five revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology. 85(6):869–79.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
