This paper attempts to elaborate on the Shafi’i school of law scholars’ theoretical interpretation of the acceptance of the opposite implicit meaning (mefhūmu-l- muhālefe) method in the ijtihad and the consequences of such interpretation on the derivation of legal regulations in that school. At the beginning of the paper, we briefly explain the discipline of linguistics in uṣūlu-l-fikh, the acceptance of implicit meaning (mefhūm) in the process of ijtihad, the linguistic and terminological definition of the concept of mefhūmu-l- muhālefe in the Shafi'i school of law, the disagreement between Hanafi and Shafi’i on this issue, and the conditions for the use of the opposite meaning method (mefhūmu-l- muhālefe) by the Shafi’i. The use of opposite meaning (mefhūmu-l- muhālefe) and its significance in the Shafi'i school of law are explained naming suitable examples. At the end of the paper, we clarify the value of the mefhūmu-l- muhālefe indication and the legal power of the indication in the ijtihad.
Keywords: the Qur'an Honorable, hadith, legislative text, implicit meaning (mefhūm), opposite implicit meaning (mefhūmu-l- muhālefe), legal reasoning (ijtihad).
References
1.
El-Iḥkām fī uṣūli-l-aḥkām, 2 toma, Dāru-l-kutub el-`ilmijje, prvo izdanje.
2.
El-Džāmiʻ eṣ-ṣaḥīḥ, El-Mektebe el-islāmijje.
3.
4.
Ibn Emīri-l-ḥādž M. El-Taqrīr vet-taḥbīr, Dāru-l-kutub el-`ilmijje, drugo izdanje, El-Maṭbe`a el-`Utmānijje, Egipat.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
