×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

THE NECESSARILY ASSUMED MEANING OF THE LEGISLATIVE TEXT (IQTIḌĀUN-NAṢṢ) IN ḤANAFĪ LEGAL SCHOOL

By
Šukrija Ramić
Šukrija Ramić
Contact Šukrija Ramić

Islamic Pedagogical Faculty, University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The work on iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ explores the theoretical interpretations of Ḥanafi scholars in relation to the necessarily assumed meaning of the legislative text (iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ) and the consequences of such an interpretation on the regulations to which the Ḥanafis came in their legal reasoning (ijtihād). At the beginning of the paper, the linguistic and terminological definition of the concept of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the Ḥanafi Law School is considered. Through the examples of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ it is explained that the Ḥanafis used iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the argumentation of legal regulations. Furthermore, the status of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the Ḥanafi Law School, and the way of giving preference in the case of contradiction between iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ and other indications are clarified. At the end of this paper, the basic results of this research are presented.

References

1.
Muslim Ḥ.K. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Dāru iḥjā’i-l-kutub el-ʻarebijje, Kairo.
2.
Rušd I. Bidājetu-l-mudžtehid, Dāru-l-marife.
3.
Ibnu Emīri-l-Ḥādž M. El-Taqrīr vet-taḥbīr, Dāru-l-kutub el-`ilmijje, drugo izdanje, El-Maṭbe`a el-`Utmānijje, Egipat.
4.
Ibnu-l-Humam K. Fetḥu-l-Qadīr šerḥu-l-Hidāje, El-Maṭbaa el-emīrijje, Egipat.
5.
Et-Temhīd fī tahrīdži-l-furū`i `ale-l-uṣūl, Pripremio dr.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.