The work on iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ explores the theoretical interpretations of Ḥanafi scholars in relation to the necessarily assumed meaning of the legislative text (iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ) and the consequences of such an interpretation on the regulations to which the Ḥanafis came in their legal reasoning (ijtihād). At the beginning of the paper, the linguistic and terminological definition of the concept of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the Ḥanafi Law School is considered. Through the examples of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ it is explained that the Ḥanafis used iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the argumentation of legal regulations. Furthermore, the status of iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ in the Ḥanafi Law School, and the way of giving preference in the case of contradiction between iqtiḍāun-naṣṣ and other indications are clarified. At the end of this paper, the basic results of this research are presented.
References
1.
Muslim Ḥ.K. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Dāru iḥjā’i-l-kutub el-ʻarebijje, Kairo.
2.
Rušd I. Bidājetu-l-mudžtehid, Dāru-l-marife.
3.
Ibnu Emīri-l-Ḥādž M. El-Taqrīr vet-taḥbīr, Dāru-l-kutub el-`ilmijje, drugo izdanje, El-Maṭbe`a el-`Utmānijje, Egipat.
4.
Ibnu-l-Humam K. Fetḥu-l-Qadīr šerḥu-l-Hidāje, El-Maṭbaa el-emīrijje, Egipat.
5.
Et-Temhīd fī tahrīdži-l-furū`i `ale-l-uṣūl, Pripremio dr.
6.
Kamali M. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, Islamic Texts Society.
7.
Kāsānī AM. Bedāi` eṣ-ṣanāi` fī tertīb eš-šerāi`.
8.
Kevrānī Ṭ.
9.
Lane E. Arabic-English Lexicon.
10.
Lubnānī SR. Šerḥu-l-Medželle, treće izdanje., Dār Iḥjā’it-turāthi-l-`Arebī, Bejrut, Libanon.
11.
Margīnānī B. El-Hidāje, dva toma.
12.
13.
Muftić T. Muʻdžem arebī busnevī.
14.
Ibn Qudāme M. Revḍatun-nāḍir ve džinnetu-l-menāẓir, Džāmiʻatu-l-imām Muḥammed ibn Saʻūd.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
