This corpus-based study focuses on the nine English central modal verbs (can, could, will, would, may, might, shall, should, and must) across the two chosen genres of the COCA corpus – Spoken and Academic genres, which show the greatest number of differences in terms of genre characteristics, such as formality or intended audience. Because research on modal verbs across genres, especially one inclusive of the spoken genre, is limited, this study investigates these two genres to test the hypothesis that the general genre characteristics influence the choice of modal verbs. As a result, the distribution of modal verbs across the different genres differs too. The results suggest that genre can indeed be indicative of the frequency and use of modal verbs, which may be ascribed to two language processes colloquialization and democratization.
References
1.
Hyland K. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Pragmatics & Beyond New Series. 1998.
2.
Modality in English. 2009.
3.
Römer U. Textbooks:A corpus-driven approach to modal auxiliaries and their didactics. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. 2004. p. 185–99.
4.
Rizvić-Eminović E, Bureković M, Bujak A. TRANSLATION OF FALSE FRIENDS AMONG B2 LEVEL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS. Zbornik radova 18. 2020;253–68.
5.
The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics.
6.
Mindt D. An Empirical grammar of the English verb: modal verbs.
7.
Millar N. Modal verbs in TIME. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 2009;14(2):191–220.
8.
Mair C, Leech G. Current Changes in English Syntax. The Handbook of English Linguistics. p. 318–42.
9.
Leech G, Hundt M, Mair C, Smith N. Change in Contemporary English. 2009.
10.
Leech G. Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961-1992. Modality in Contemporary English. 2003. p. 223–40.
11.
Krug MG. Emerging English Modals. 2000.
12.
Biber D, Conrad S, Reppen R. Corpus Linguistics. 1998.
13.
Hinkel E. The effects of essay topics on modal verb uses in L1 and L2 academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics. 2009;41(4):667–83.
14.
Facchinetti R. Pragmatic and sociological constraints on the functions of may in contemporary British English. Modality in Contemporary English. 2003. p. 301–28.
15.
Davies M.
16.
Davies M. The 385+ million word Corpus of Contemporary American English (1990–2008+). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 2009;14(2):159–90.
17.
Coates J, Leech G. The meanings of the modals in modern British and American English. :22–34.
18.
Coates J. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries.
19.
Bowie J, Wallis S, Aarts B. Contemporary change in modal usage in spoken British English: mapping the impact of “genre.” English Modality. 2013. p. 57–94.
20.
Biber D, Conrad S. Register, Genre, and Style. 2009.
21.
Sinclair JMcH. Review of Biber, Johansson, Leech, Conrad & Finegan (1999): The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 2001;6(2):339–59.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
