×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

BOSNIAN STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE LEARNING BELIEFS WITH RESPECT TO THEIR PROFICIENCY LEVEL

By
Esma Latić ,
Esma Latić

International Burch University , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Vildana Dubravac
Vildana Dubravac

International Burch University , Sarajevo , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Language learning beliefs create a considerable impact on the students' behavior, and thus greately affect the final learning outcome. Therefore, there exists a compeling need to explore learners' beliefs, and in particular to specify the stances of those more successful learners, to provide accordingly a better learning envoronment for all students. The aim of the current paper was to investigate the language learning beliefs among Bosnian university students, and to focus on the differences that exist between the groups of the participants based on their self-evaluated proficiency level. A one way ANOVA revealed no significant differences in the overall BALLI, whereas a significant difference was observed in one of the five subscales. The present study findings might be used to provide ground for the future improvement of language learning and teaching in a foreign language context similar to Bosnia and Herzegovina.

References

1.
Schommer M. Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology. 82(3):498–504.
2.
Lightbown P, Spada NM. How languages are learned.
3.
Mori Y. Epistemological Beliefs and Language Learning Beliefs: What Do Language Learners Believe About Their Learning? Language Learning. 1999;49(3):377–415.
4.
Omaggio AC. Successful language learners: What do we know about them. ERIC/CLL News Bulletin. 5:2–3.
5.
Ortega L. Understanding second language acquisition.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.