×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

GIFTEDNESS AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AS DETERMINANTS OF COMPETENCE SELF-PERCEPTION IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS

By
Anela Hasanagić ,
Anela Hasanagić

Islamski pedagoški fakultet u Zenici

Asmir Zukić ,
Asmir Zukić

Osnovna škola “Čengić Vila 1” Sarajevo

Nina Bulajić
Nina Bulajić

The Montessori house Sarajevo

Abstract

Conducting this research, we wanted to explore the competence self-perception in gifted elementary school students and to compare different aspects of gifted and non-gifted children’s self-perception. In addition to this, we investigated gender differences as well as the correlation between self-perception and academic achievement. The research sample comprised 62 participant, 31 gifted and 31 non-gifted children aged 10 to 15. A matched participant design was used and the controlling variables were: academic achievement in the current and previous grades, gender and a socio-economic status. All the participants were tested by two instruments: The Socio-Demographic instrument and the Self-Perception Profile for Children developed by Susan Harter (1985), which measures six aspects of self-perception (competencies): school competence, social competence, sports competence, physical competence, behavioral competence and general self-perception. The results showed that the highest level of students’ competence was observed for the school competence aspect, then behavioral one, followed by general self- concept, while a lower level of physical and sports competence was reached. Furthermore, there is a statistically significant correlation between most of the personal competence sub-scales, except between sports competence on the one hand, and school competence and behavioral competence, on the other hand. This implies that competence self- perception is the construct comprised of different interrelated aspects and if one shows a tendency for positive self-perception in one aspect; most probably that person will have positive self- perception in another as well. No statistically significant differences were found between the gifted and the non-gifted children, which means that giftedness is not an important factor of self-perception. Also, gender differences were significant only among the gifted children where the boys perceived themselves as more competent in the social and physical aspects.

References

1.
Bedeković V, M J, Kolak A. Sociometric status of talented students and their position in the society’s (classroom) elite.
2.
Minton HL. Introduction to „The uses of intelligence tests.
3.
Stevanović M, Ajanović D. Školska pedagogija.
4.
Stringer RW, Heath N. Academic Self Perception and its Relationship to Academic Performance. Canadian Journal of Education. 31, 2:327–45.
5.
Vasta R, Haith Marshall M, Miller Scott A. Dječja psihologija.
6.
Vizek Vidović V, Rijavec M, Vlahović-Štetić V, Miljković D. Psihologija obrazovanja.
7.
Vukosav J, Sindik J. Povezanost dimenzija tri mjerna instrumenta za procjenu darovitosti i neverbalne inteligencije predškolske djece. Metodički ogledi. 17:149–75.
8.
Zarevski P. Struktura i priroda inteligencije.
9.
10.
Milligam JL. Assessment of Giftedness: A Concise and Practical Guide.
11.
12.
Jurasić A. Što je darovitost i talentiranost?
13.
Jurasić A. Osobine darovite djece.
14.
Perrenoud. Key Competencies. Survey. 5.
15.
Tomljenović Ž, Nikčević-Milković A. Samopoštovanje i anksioznost u ispitnim situacijama kod djece osnovnoškolske dobi.
16.
Wilkinson AL. Academic Self-Perceptions of Elementary School Children.
17.
Betts G, Neihart M.
18.
Grabar M. Nadarenost i neurotski perfekcionizam kod osnovnoškolaca. MA disertation.
19.
Bezinović P. Percepcija osobne kompetentnosti kao dimenzija samopoimanja.
20.
Buljubašić Kuzmanović V, Botić T. Odnos školskog uspjeha i socijalnih vještina kod učenika osnovne škole. Život i škola, br. 27:38-54,.
21.
Cvetković Lay J. Darovito je što ću sa sobom? Priručnik za obitelj, vrtić i školu.
22.
Cvetković-Lay J, Sekulić Majurec A. Darovito je, što ću s njim?
23.
Čudina-Obradović M. Nadarenost: razumijevanje, prepoznavanje, razvijanje.
24.
Dacey J, Kenny M.
25.
Filipović A. Samopoštovanje i percepcija kompetentnosti darovite djece.
26.
Gardner H, Kornhaber ML, Wake WK. Inteligencija: različita gledišta.
27.
Bratanić M. Mikropedagogija: interakcijsko-komunikacijski aspekt odgoja.
28.
Grgin T. Edukacijska psihologija, 2.
29.
The Essential Sternberg Essays on Intelligence, Psychology and Education.
30.
Kerla M, Suzić N. Razlike u percepcijama osobne kompetentnosti i samopoštovanja kod populacije adolescenata. Naša škola Year. 63(233).
31.
Lacković-Grgin K. Samopoimanje mladih.
32.
Lebedina-Manzoni M, Loter M. Percepcija sebe kod adolescenata u Hrvatskoj. Kriminologija i socijalna integracija. 19(2011) Br 1:1–130.
33.
Litster KM. The self-concepts of gifted and non-gifted students: A meta-analysis.
34.
McGregor C. The relationship between self-perception and academic achievement among native students in grade five and grade six.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.