×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

AHL-SUNNA METHODOLOGY OF RESEARCHING AKAID ISSUES II

By
Zuhdija Adilović
Zuhdija Adilović

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica

Abstract

Ahl-sunna wel-jama’at has a specific and recognizable method and rules which applies to studying shariah issues in general, and in particular to Aquida themes. They distinguish it from various sects and fractions. However, the method and rules that were obvious to the followers of ahl-sunna through generations are hardly recognizable today. In the previous Proceedings I explained some of the rules and here I explain the rest of them: Fifth rule: nonexistence of contradictories between the Revelation and reason. Sixth rule: Primary meanings (zahirun-nusus) of Qur’an and sunna quotations are understandable to those they are directed. Seventh rule: Believe in the obscure ayats and follow the clear ones. Eighth rule: Legitimacy of understanding Qur’an and Sunna by the first Muslim generations. These are the basic rules that reflect the precise methodology of researching Aquida themes at ahl-sunna wel-jama’at. I hope this paper at least partially clarifies this important issue.

References

1.
Subki. Ali ibn Abdul-Kafi: El-Ibhadž fi šerhil-minhadž, Darul-kutui el-masrijje, prvo izdanje.
2.
Tejmijje I, b A. Abdul-Halim: Medžmu’atu tefsir sejhil-islam ibn tejmijje.
3.
Kadi. Abdul-Džebbar: Fadlul-i’tizal ve tabekatul-mu’tezile, Ed-Dar et-tunisijje lin-nešr.
4.
Kajsi. Ebu Muhammed Mekki ibn Ebi Talib: El-Idah li nasihil-kur’an ve mensuhihi, Metabi’u Džami’atil-imam, prvo izdanje.
5.
Kastalani. Ebul-Abbas Šihabud-din Ahmed ibn Muhammed: Iršadus-sari li sahihil-buhari, Darul-kitabi el-arabi, sedmo izdanje.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.