×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

DIMENZIJE ONTOLOŠKOG ZASNIVANJA TRADICIONALNE ARHITEKTURE

By
Nusret Isanović
Nusret Isanović

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica

Abstract

In architecture, human need to be a man is most vividly realized, but his desire for beauty, perfection and universality is projected as well. It encompasses his thoughts about the Supreme, himself and the universe, and expresses “an objective identity of a concept and things”. This paper develops a discourse on architecture as a universal form of art which, as such, recognizably marks two major artistic traditions, one which is based on the idea of an image and the other which is based on the idea of a sign. These traditions also determine the nature, the basic forms of expression and the purpose of architecture that has developed inside of them. The paper also talks about arhé of architecture and its dependency on mind, and about the relationship of architecture, mind and existence. By means of an achieved part the mind sets and leads telos of architecture, it allows reaching to its meaning and provides its works to become an integral part of the whole existence. With its purposefulness, functionality and vivacity it contributes to the art being part of an unique “set of life”. With its basic meaning, architecture refers to the ‘arhé’ , the beginning of something, but not in a timely but in an ontological and axiological sense. But architecture is ‘arhé’ in relation to other arts as well. It ranks first among the artistic types and therefore it is ‘arhé’. The remainder of this paper discusses the architecture and the principle of “order”, characteristic nature of traditional architecture and the ontological significance of the principle of Tawheed in the establishment of Islamic architecture. The last part of the paper illuminates the spiritual significance of space in the context of Islamic architecture.

References

1.
Nasr SH. Srce islama.
2.
Hauzer A. Socijalna istorija umetnosti i književnosti I.
3.
Huizinga J. Jesen srednjeg vijeka.
4.
Ikbal M. Obnova vjerske misli u islamu, Sarajevo, Starješinstvo Islamske zajednice u SRBiH.
5.
Kupareo R. Govor umjetnosti, Zagreb, Kršćanska sadašnjost.
6.
Lings M. The Quranic Art of Calligraphy and Illumination.
7.
Meyer E, Zagreb. Arhitektura i jezik, u: Filozofska istraživanja, god. 8:2.
8.
Nasr SH. Foreword, u.
9.
Nasr SH. Islamic Art and Spirituality.
10.
Hiti F. Istorija Arapa.
11.
Nasr SH. Tradicionalni islam u modernom svijetu.
12.
Sedlmayr H. Katedrala kao slika neba, u: Katedrala: mjera i svjetlost.
13.
Redžić H. Islamska umjetnost, Zagreb.
14.
Šarčević A. Iskustvo i vrijeme.
15.
Šeling FVJ. Spisi iz filozofije umjetnosti.
16.
Vattimo G. Kraj moderne.
17.
Vitruvius MP. Deset knjiga o arhitekturi (De architectura libri decem.
18.
Al Fārūqī IR. Tewhīd: Its Relevance for Thought and Life.
19.
Hegel GVF.
20.
Grlić D. Estetika IV, S onu stranu estetike.
21.
rječnik G hrvatski.
22.
Gadamer HG. Nasljeđe Evrope.
23.
Gadamer HG. Istina i metoda.
24.
Frey D. Bit arhitekture, u: Bečka škola povijesti umjetnosti (priredila Knežević, S.
25.
Ettinghausen R. Ambijent stvoren čovjekovom rukom, u: Svijet Islama, Beograd, Jugoslovenska revija i Vuk Karadžić.
26.
pravoslavlja E.
27.
Elijade M. Sveto i profano.
28.
Eco U. Ime ruže.
29.
Coomaraswamy AK. Christian and Oriental Philosophy of Art.
30.
Mensching G. Titus Burckhardt, Vom Wesen heiliger Kunst in den Weltreligionen. Origo Verlag, Zürich 1955, 234 pp. Zeitschrift für Religions- und Geistesgeschichte. 1956;8(3):269.
31.
Burckhardt T. Art of Islam.
32.
Bler ŠS/ B, M D. Umetnost i arhitektura, u: Oksfordska istorija islama (priredio Espozito. Dž. L()).
33.
Ardalan N /Bakhtiar, L. The Sense of Unity, Chicago/London.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.