×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

Characteristics of connecting hamza-wasla interpretations at the morphological word

By
Mejra Softić
Mejra Softić

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica

Abstract

Connecting hamza-wasla is defined as a special type of a bound grammatical morpheme. Its primary function is conditioned by phonetically-phonological rules and is manifested through facilitating the pronunciation of a certain word when, to a certain extent, it has some function in formally-grammatical changes but not in the creating a new meaning. General lack of its individual morphological interpretations results in identifying connecting hamza with disconnecting one. It further implicates its orthographic variation and misunderstanding. Connecting hamza-wasla as an inflectional affix is a feature of certain types of verbs and their individual forms. For some nouns it is a formal compensation for elided third consonant, and its manifestation in definite article is also conditioned by the rules of Arabic syllable structure. Phonetic, and in some cases formal,elision of connecting hamza as a bound grammatical morpheme is specific in certain context, such as middle position.

References

1.
Abd-at-Tawāb R, al-‘arabiyya M, al-’ūlā, al-kānğī M, al-Qāhira.
2.
Bin Abdul Hakim MK, Romdani, Maulidah Hasanah. al-Akhṭā’ fī Istikhdām al-Af‘āl al-Mujarradah wa-al-Af‘āl al-Mazīdah fī al-Jumal al-Basīṭah ladá Ṭullāb Qism Ta‘līm al-Lughah al-‘Arabīyah, Jāmi‘at Jākartā al-Ḥukūmīyah. Al-Ma‘rifah. 16(2):221–31.
3.
al-‘Ānī. Selmān Hasan: at-Taškīl as-sawtī, at-tab‘a al-’ūlā, an-Nādī al-’adabī al-laqāfī.
4.
al-Imārāt al-ʿArabiyya al-Muttaḥida. Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition.
5.
As‘ad-an-Nādiri M, al-‘arabiyya N, al-lāniya, al-‘asriyya, Beyrūt.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.