The research examinesthe subjects of guardianship of a minor’s property in
the Sharia Law and the Family Law of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The main purpose of the study is to determine the extent to which the
normative solutions regarding the subjects of guardianship of a minor are
convergant or divergant in the two legal systems. After the term guardianship is defined and its role is discussed, we proceed with a thorough analysis
of the subjects of guardianship: a ward, the Guardianship Authority and a
quardian. The special attention is given to the analysis of the conditions and
criteria for performing duties of a guardian. The question whether being a
guardian is voluntarily based or it is a legal duty is treated carefully. In the
process of research and writing up the current paper the following methods
were used: an analytical-synthetic method and a comparative method. We
have reached the conclusion that the two legal systems are compatible with
regard to the conceptual definition and theoretical explanation of the purpose of guardianship as well as in with regard to the standardization of work
capacity, the ability to perform duties of a guardian and ethical standards
being a prereguisite for a quardian. The differences appear in relation to the
scope of a guardian’s protection, the concept of the Guardianship Authority,
the inclusion of religious criteria in or its exclusion from the requirements
for a quardian, and the way in which a guardian of the property is determined.
References
1.
Medželle i ahkjami šerije: Otomanski gragjanski zakon (1906.
2.
Zuḥaylī W. Al-Fiqh al-islamī wa adillatuh. Knjige IV i VII.
3.
Traljić N i B, S. Porodično pravo.
4.
Tirmiḏī. Sunan.
5.
Sokolović S. Obaveze roditelja prema djeci. Glasnik Vrhovnog islamskog starješinstva u SFRJ. 31(9–10):362–77.
6.
Mijović P. Izborni zakon Bosne i Hercegovine i limiti etnonacionalne paradigme. Reforma izbornog zakonodavstva Bosne i Hercegovine. 2021.
7.
Mijović P. Izborni zakon Bosne i Hercegovine i limiti etnonacionalne paradigme. Reforma izbornog zakonodavstva Bosne i Hercegovine. 2021.
8.
Silajdžić A. Šeriatsko roditeljsko i rodbinsko pravo.
9.
Silajdžić A. Testamenat u šeriatskom pravu.
10.
Sābiq S. Fiqh al-sunna.
11.
Popović M. Starateljstvo nad maloletnicima.
12.
Muradbegović H. Tumač šeriatskih propisa hanefijskog mezheba o ženitbi, obitelji i nasljedstvu.
13.
Muftić T. Arapsko-bosanski rječnik.
14.
Mladenović M. Porodično pravo. Knjiga II.
15.
Dāwūd A. Sunan. Knjiga II.
16.
al-kuwaytiyya M. Knjiga VII.
17.
Jakovac D. Starateljstvo za posebne slučajeve u jugoslavenskom pravu. Magistarski rad.
18.
Māğa I. Sunan. Knjiga I.
19.
Subjekti starateljstva nad imovinomaloljetnika u šerijatskom pravu i porodičnom pravu FBiH Nedim Begović.
20.
Đozo H. Skrb o siročadi“. Glasnik Vrhovnog starješinstva Islamske vjerske zajednice NDH. 10(8):209–13.
21.
Džananović I. Primjena šerijatskog porodičnog prava kroz praksu Vrhovnog šerijatskog suda 1914-1946.
22.
Džananović I. Pravna i poslovna sposobnost u šerijatskom pravu (elehliyye)“. Zbornik radova Islamskog teološkog fakulteta, br. 3:51–73.
23.
Knjiga DS. Bejrut: Dār al-kutub al-‘ilmiyya.
24.
Bušatlić A. Porodično i nasljedno pravo muslimana.
25.
Bušatlić A. Muslimansko roditeljsko i rodbinsko pravo“. Gajret. 10(19):298–9.
26.
Brkić M. Problem muslimanske siročadi“. El-Hidaje. 6(3):61–2.
27.
Abū Zahra M. Al-Aḥwāl al-šaḫṣiyya. Kairo: Dār al-fikr al-‘arabī.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
