×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review paper

ISLAM AND MUSLIM-CHRISTIAN RELATIONS IN NORWAY

By
Leirvik Oddbjørn
Leirvik Oddbjørn

Faculty of Theology of the University of Oslo

Abstract

In this paper the author describes and analyzes central features of Islam and Muslim-Christian relations in Norway. By close observation of the tension between interreligious solidarity and aggressive identity politics, the author highlights some central features of the trust-building Christian-Muslim dialogue in Norway. He also notes how anti-Islamic sentiments in part of the majority population are reflected in radicalization among some Muslim youths. However, the situation in general is described in more optimistic terms. He also identifies two examples showing that the majority of the Muslim population seem to endorse strong values evident in society in general– such as the welfare state and gender equality. Finally, the author poses the question pertaining to the way in which Christians and Muslims may adopt a unified stance against extremism.

References

1.
Kristenledere sammen mot islamfobi og muslimhets» (Christian leaders together agains Islamophobia and defamation of Muslims.
2.
Hagen CI. Ærlig talt. Memoarer 1944–2007.
3.
Døving A, Shami S, Lindholm T. Religious Commitment and Social Integration: Are there Significant Links? A Pilot Study of Muslims in the Oslo Area with a Family Background from Pakistan. SSRN Electronic Journal.
4.
Integreringsbarometeret 2012, Holdninger til innvandrere, integrering og mangfold (Integration barometer 2012, Attitudes to questions concerning immigrants, integration and diversity. IMDi Rapport/Report.
5.
Ishaq B. Muslimer i endring.

Citation

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.