Home Current Archive Editorial board
About us
About us OPEN ACCESS DECLARATION Focus and Scope
News Contact
×
Home Current Archive Editorial board

About us OPEN ACCESS DECLARATION Focus and Scope
News Contact
Review paper
Published: 01.12.2012.
PDF
https://doi.org/10.51728/issn.2637-1480.2013.225

Analyses and understandings of syntactic same-root forms in arabic linguistics

By
Mithat Jugo
Mithat Jugo

Islamic pedagogical faculty in Zenica

View authors publications

Search this author on:

PubMed | Google Scholar

Abstract

Repetition of the same lexical root in two or more words related to the syntactic level is the linguistic phenomenon known in oral and written Arabic language expression. The paper presents the nature of research of this phenomenon in the classical and modern Arabic linguistic thought. The research shows that the classics touched upon same-root syntactic forms in the following sections: derivation, the absolute object, syntactic binding of attributes and nouns, and in certain stylistic figures, although this phenomenon has not been a primary objective of their research. The same-root syntactic structures get their clear definition of terminology in the research of commentators of the Qur'an and in modern Arabic linguistics, and their research is placed in clear linguistic frameworks. The paper points out the most important studies that have dealt with this phenomenon, as well as a number of linguistic features of this phenomenon, such as: cohesion and coherence of the text, argumentative function of structures, and an important semantic function. Keywords: same-root forms, repetition, grammar, derivation, an absolute object, figures of speech, commentators of the Qur'an, Arabic linguistics

References

1.
Sawlah A. Al-hiğāğ fī al-Qur’an min hilāli ’ahammi hasā’isihī al-’uslūbiyyah.
2.
Ibn Manzūr MM. Lisānu -l-’arab.
3.
Kitāb al-badī’i, objavio: Ignatiyus Kračkovski.
4.
Al-Qazwīnī AH. Al-īdāh.
5.
Ğawāhiru-l-’alfāz, 1. izd.
6.
Ar-Radiyy I. Šarh ar-radiyy ’ala-l-kāfiyah.
7.
Ar-Rāzī F. Nihāyatu-l-’īğāz fī dirāyati-l-’i’ağāz.
8.
As-Safadī S. a.) Ğinan al-ğinās fi ’ilm al-badī’i, 1. izd.
9.
Miftāhu-l-’ulūm.
10.
11.
Sībawayh. Al-Kitāb.
12.
Al-’usūl fī an-nahw.
13.
Šarh Kitāb Sībawayh.
14.
As-Sālih S ubhī. Dirāsah fī fiqhi al-luġah.
15.
As-Suyūtī Ğ. Al-Muzhir fī ’ulūmi al-luġah wa anwā’iha.
16.
At-Tabarī MĞ. Ğāmi’u-l-bayān fī t’awīl-l-Qur’an.
17.
Az-Zamahšarī Ğ. Al-Kaššāf ’an haqā’iq ġawāmidi-t-tanzīl wa ’uyūni-l-’aqāwīl fī wuğūh at-t’awīl.
18.
Az-Zamahšarī Ğ. Al-mufassal fī san’ati-l-’i’arāb, 1. izd.
19.
De Beaugrande R, Dressler WU. Introduction to Text Linguistics.
20.
Abdullatīf MH. Fī binā’i-l- ğumlati-l-’arabiyyah.
21.
Al-’Ağmī FŠ. ’Ab’ādu-l-’arabiyyah-dirāsah fī fiqhi al-luġah al-’arabiyyah wa tārīh tatawwurihā wa ’alāqātihā bibaqiyyati al-luġāti as-sāmiyyāh.
22.
Al-’Alāwī Y b H. At-Tirāz al-mutadammin li-’asrāri-l-balāġah wa ’ulūmi haqā’iqi-l-’i’ağāz.
23.
Kitāb ’asrār al-’arabiyyah.
24.
Šarh Ibn ’Aqīl.
25.
Kitāb as-sina’atayn al-kitābah wa aš-ši’ar.
26.
At-tahrīru wa at-tanwīru.
27.
Azzah ŠM. ’Ilmu luġati an-nassī-an-nazariyah wa at-tatbīq.
28.
Al-’Abd M. An-Nassu al-hiğāğī al-’arabī-dirāsah fī wasā’ili al-’iqnā’i. Mağallah an-naqd al-’adabī fusūl.
29.
Balaġātu an-nassi.
30.
Al-badī’u bayna al-balāġati-l-’arabiyati wa al-lisāniyāti an-nasiyyah.
31.
Ibn Ğinnī O. Al-Hasā’is.
32.
’Ilmu al-luġati an-nassi bayna an-nazariyati wa at-tatbīq-dirāsah tatbīqiyyah alā as-suwar al-makiyyah.
33.
Al-Hafāğī IS. Sirru-l-fasāhati.
34.
Halliday MAK, Ruqaiya H. Cohesion in English, 2. izd.
35.
Hassān T. Al-luġah al-’arabiyyah m’anāha wa mabnāhā.
36.
Ibrahīm AI. Balaġatu-l-hiğāğ fī aš-ši’ar al-’arabī-ši’ar ibn ar-rūmī namudağan.

Citation

Copyright

Authors retain copyright. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

{{ submission.title }}

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.